|
Sospeso performs
songs by Kurt Weill at the Orensanz
Center concert in February.
He was one of the outstanding composers in the generation that came
to maturity after World War I, and a key figure in the development
of modern forms of musical theatre. His successful and innovatory
work for Broadway during the 1940s was a development in more popular
terms of the exploratory stage works that had made him the foremost
avant-garde theatre composer of the Weimar Republic.
Although, unlike
his contemporary Hindemith, Weill did not bequeath to posterity
a corpus of pedagogical writings or a codifiable musical language,
he must be viewed in retrospect as the most influential German composer
of his generation. His example is still invoked today by art composers
interested in pursuing stylistic pluralism, whether this is taken
to mean the adoption of popular idioms, the ‘crossover’
from art to commercial music, or stylistic contrast as a compositional
element in its own right. Equally important was his advocacy of
‘gestic music’, by which he meant a theatre score that
precisely undergirds and pre-defines the pace, timing, character
and mood of the drama. Der Jasager, a casebook example
of gestic music reduced to essentials, left an indelible mark on
20th-century music theatre, whether that of his younger German contemporaries
(from Blacher to Orff), his American colleagues (Copland’s
The Second Hurricane, and thus indirectly Britten’s
The Little Sweep) or the minimalist theatre composers of
subsequent decades. Another of his influential characteristics,
widely attributed to his association with Brecht and the ‘alienation
effect’, was a supposedly ironic detachment of his music from
the text or context. Further, just as Brecht advocated a ‘separation
of elements’ in the art of acting, so Weill’s Weimar
scores lend themselves to the kind of analysis in which the ingredients
are seen to conflict dialectically rather than cohering into a unified
whole.
In none of these
respects would Weill himself have claimed to be the innovator, however
aware he was of the influence he exerted on his contemporaries.
He deferred in his writings to Mozart as a quintessentially ‘gestic’
opera composer, and the stylistic plurality he avowed is, of course,
as old as Monteverdi. But by presenting these devices forcefully
in modern contexts he offered examples which other composers could,
and did, usefully follow. The specific ‘tone’ of Weill’s
works of the late 1920s is often consciously quoted, particularly
his distinctive handling of bitonal harmony, triadic atonality and
jazz timbres. In the Broadway musical his influence has perhaps
been less noticeable, partly because of transformations in the genre
itself, partly because none of his shows have remotely approached
the iconic status accorded to such contemporary productions as Porgy
and Bess, Oklahoma!, Annie Get Your Gun or Guys
and Dolls. Nonetheless, their importance in elevating the genre’s
subject matter, sharpness of characterization and general craftsmanship
is unquestionable. Finally, in the search for new audiences and
hybrid forms of music theatre, Weill’s name and the protean
example of Die Dreigroschenoper continue to be invoked
by composers as varied as Hans Werner Henze and John
Adams in their own attempts to broaden the base for contemporary
music.
J. Bradford
Robinson, in the Grove. Image © 2003 Milken Family
Foundation.
|